Bug 2968

Summary: ntfs-config error with x32 repo enabled
Product: [ROSA-based products] ROSA Fresh Reporter: Vladimir Potapov <v.potapov>
Component: Packages from MainAssignee: ROSA Linux Bugs <bugs>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED QA Contact: ROSA Linux Bugs <bugs>
Severity: normal    
Priority: Normal CC: alex.burmashev, denis.silakov
Version: FreshFlags: v.potapov: qa_verified+
alex.burmashev: published+
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Platform: --- ROSA Vulnerability identifier:
RPM Package: urpmi ISO-related:
Bad POT generating: Upstream:

Description Vladimir Potapov 2013-10-23 17:48:14 MSK 
search_packages: skip ntfs-config-1.1-2-rosa2012.1.x86_64 matching ntfs-config since newer version of the pakcage exists in repositories
search_packages: found ntfs-config-1.1-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64 matching ntfs-config
found package(s): ntfs-config-1.1-2-rosa2012.1.x86_64 ntfs-config-1.1-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64
opening rpmdb (root=, write=)
chosen ntfs-config-1.1-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64 for ntfs-config|ntfs-config
selecting ntfs-config-1.1-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64
requiring gksu,ntfs-3g,pygtk2.0-libglade,python(abi)[== 2.7],usermode for ntfs-config-1.1-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64
not selecting pygtk2.0-libglade-2.24.0-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64 since the more recent pygtk2.0-libglade-2.24.0-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64 is installed
not selecting usermode-1.111-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64 since the more recent usermode-1.111-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64 is installed
not selecting ntfs-3g-2013.1.13-1-rosa2012.1.x86_64 since the more recent ntfs-3g-2013.1.13-1-rosa2012.1.x86_64 is installed
Skipping python-2.7.4-7-rosa2012.1.x86_64 since newer version of the package exists in repositories
no packages match python(abi)[== 2.7] (it is either in skip.list or already rejected)
Skipping python-2.7.3-6-rosa2012.1.x86_64 since newer version of the package exists in repositories
no packages match python (it is either in skip.list or already rejected)
unselecting ntfs-config-1.1-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64
adding a reason to already rejected package ntfs-config-1.1-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64: unsatisfied 5174
Пакеты usermode-1.111-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64, ntfs-3g-2013.1.13-1-rosa2012.1.x86_64, pygtk2.0-libglade-2.24.0-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64 уже установлен
Не удаётся установить запрошенный пакет:
ntfs-config-1.1-4-rosa2012.1.x86_64 (из-за неудовлетворённости python-2.7.3-6-rosa2012.1.x86_64)
Comment 1 Denis Silakov 2013-10-23 22:39:43 MSK 
Advisory:
Fixed perl-URPM to take package architecture into account before reporting that "newer package exists in repository".

A typical situation with both 32bit and 64bit repos enabled in the 64bit system is that you add a 32bit container. So you can have foo-2.i586 from container and foo-1.x86-64 from usual repository. If you will try to install 'urpmi foo', it will actually install nothing - first, foo-2 will be rejected since we have 64 bit foo, but foo-1.x86-64 will be rejected since there is a newer foo-2. Moreover, some collisions may arise when resolving dependencies for foo-2 - it seems that the situation described in this bug is from this series.

Build lists:
https://abf.rosalinux.ru/build_lists/1365417
https://abf.rosalinux.ru/build_lists/1365416

How to test:
A recent example is ntfs-config in 64bit system with both 32bit and 64bit repos enabled. Remove ntfs-config if it is installed. Add 32bit container from bug #2952 and try to install 'urpmi ntfs-config'. Expected behavior: urpmi should install 64bit ntfs-config-1.1-4 from usual repositories. If you add 64bit container, urpmi should install ntfs-config-1.1-5 from that container.
Comment 2 Vladimir Potapov 2013-10-24 20:34:53 MSK 
perl-URPM-4.43-22-rosa2012.1
******************** Advisory *******************
Fixed perl-URPM to take package architecture into account before reporting that "newer package exists in repository
*************************************************
QA Verified